Post by bradwatsonmiami on May 8, 2012 8:02:33 GMT -5
The following is page 1 (5) from the 74-page "book/scroll"
There Are No Coincidences - there is synchronism, design and alignment
'Grand Scheme' of God vs. Quantum Physics & Chaos Theory
“Ancient Egyptian ministers of religion were also the ministers of science…two of the noblest missions.”
– Jean Champollion
“Science is the attempt to make the chaotic diversity of our sense-experience correspond to a logically uniform system of thought.” (Quantum mechanics has experimentally proven that there can be effects without ‘local’ causes; that material things can pop in and out of existence thanks to bizarre phenomena called quantum fluctuations.) “The theory yields much, but it hardly brings us close to the secrets of the Old One… In any case, I am convinced that God does not play dice." – Einstein b 3.14*
For some time now, the scientific community has been split. Both groups strongly believe in the capabilities of science and humankind’s destiny to continue to discover the natural secrets of this universe. Both factions agree that we’ve uncovered and created great things with science in the past and that this will continue to intensify in the future. The ‘first group of thought’ agrees with Albert Einstein when he said, “Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind”, and “Subtle is the Lord, malicious he is not. God hides his secrets because of his essential loftiness, but not by means of ruse”. Another Einstein quote, “I want to know how God created the world. I am not interested in this or that phenomenon; I want to know God’s thoughts. The rest are details”. Many scientists now, and throughout history, strongly believe in God - The Creator has been scientifically proven! For them, science and religion share the same goal: the pursuit of truth.
The second group of thought believe that there is no ‘Creator’ – no ‘Grand Scheme’. Humankind has ‘created God’. They often view religion as being for the mentally inferior. ‘God’ just doesn’t seem logical to them (and others) - they might even refer to themselves as atheists. For these scientists, everything happens by ‘chance’ based on quantum physics and chaos theory: the study of phenomena which appear random, but in fact have an element of regularity which can be described mathematically. Everything that happens affects everything else – ‘The Butterfly Effect’. (The scientific term chaos refers to an underlying interconnectedness that exists in apparently random events. Simple equations have the ability to generate motion so complex, so sensitive to measurement, that it appears to be by chance. It has shown that simple systems, obeying precise laws, can nevertheless act in a seemingly ‘random’ manner - the unpredictable leading to the new. Feedback loops exist everywhere.) These scientists may believe: “We are gods of our own universe(s) – we are the creators." So which view is correct: (A) or (B)?
In Corey S. Powell’s book God in the Equation, he constantly refers to Einstein as “the prophet of a new sci-religious era”. Einstein called God, “The Old One” and ‘put God into his equations’ describing his theory of general relativity. The Creator was symbolized by Lambda - the cosmological constant - and was once called Einstein’s biggest blunder! Powell tells the story of how this controversial factor got into the equations, how it was accepted by the scientific community, then rejected (due to the Big Bang & expanding universe), then accepted again, (then rejected again by João Magueijo's Varying Speed of Light Theory then accepted again by ‘dark energy’.) He states how recent cosmologists’ reports of our universe accelerating in its expansion are all based on this same factor: God in the Equation. Einstein and his followers’ use of the ‘God factor’ in science has never been recognized for what it is - a new era - a giant step in the history of human spirituality! But Einstein sought other answers – other theories besides those credited him in his lifetime. He spent the last 40 years of his life laboring over a unified field theory (‘Grand Unification’) which would unite general relativity – his theory of spacetime and gravitation – with electromagnetism and the strong and weak forces of the atom. M-theory may be this unified theory, but that’s only physics. Where are the other equations with GOD in them – ‘simple general public equations’ that wed much more than just subatomic particles/matter, forces, and spacetime - equations that can join history and present-day, religions and science? Where are the equations that unify peoples; that create peace and ‘Heaven on Earth’?!
“Einstein’s search for a unified theory in physics ran parallel with his wish for global peace and a unified world government where people treated other people humanely and sensibly. He spent his life working towards both of these goals: the unity of science & humanity.” – 101 Things You Didn’t Know About Einstein
My booklet reflects 33 years of sci-religious research and many more years in my previous lives! My The Conglomerate of Nonparallel-Universes Theory, Plan-it Theory: GOD=7_4 algorithm** or FOD=6_4 (PlanEt Nestor), U21nified S19trings Theory – the ‘Theory of Everything’, S=19 (18.6 algorithm/'fractal') Theory, Speed & Power of Thought Theory, Theory of Rena†ivi†y/Conglomeratal Energy eternal/Conglomeratal Relationships eternal Theories, Reincarnation Theory & its 23 Principles/Theory of Luck are these ‘God in the equations’. These may be the “7 seals” and this booklet may be the “book/scroll” referred to in Rev. 5:1-10:10. Have prophesies been fulfilled? Yes. And yet, it’s ultimately up to you to decide.
“You believe in a God who plays dice, and I in complete law & order,” said Einstein.
By the way, the answer to the question above - which is correct: (A) ‘Grand Scheme’ of God -or- (B) Quantum Physics & Chaos Theory? It’s (C) both of the above! (‘A or B’ is often a trap!) “Perhaps God can play dice and create a universe of complete law & order, in the same breath,” says Ian Stewart in Does God Play Dice? “This is a strange universe in which nothing may be as it seems. Familiar geometrical shapes such as circles and ellipses give way to infinitely complex structures known as fractals, the fluttering of a *butterfly’s wings can change the weather, and the gravitational attraction of a creature in a distant galaxy can change the fate of a solar system."
In Paths from Science towards God, Arthur Peacocke states, “God could cause particular events to occur which would express God’s intentions. These latter would not otherwise have happened had God not so specifically intended. Any such interaction of God with the world-System would be initially with it as a whole. One would expect this initial interaction to be followed by a kind of ‘trickle-down’ effect as each level affected by the particular divine intention then has an influence on lower levels and so on down the hierarchies of complexity to the level at which God intends to effect a particular purpose. We have already seen how in ‘chaotic’ systems, especially dissipative ones, states can differ in pattern and organization (and so in information content) yet be very close in energy74. This provides a flexible route for the transmission of divinely influenced information from the world-System as a whole down to particular systems within that whole. These could well include those of individual human-brains-in-human-bodies-in-society and so this could be the means whereby God is experienced in acts of meditation and worship – as well as recognized as ‘special providence’ in events judged to be responses to such human acts.” Or you could simply say, “There Are No Coincidences."
*Biblios=314 (Greek isopsephy) "God is a Geometer” = "Αεί3 Ο1 Θεός4 Ο1 Μέγας5 Γεωμετρεί9" - Plato pi=3.14159
Note: Since first writing this, there has been great discussion of Intelligent Design vs. Darwinian Evolution (“random mutations”). And there’s a continuing debate of whether this universe is anthropic (designed specifically for humans). As long as the ‘religious’ accept that the universe is ~13.82 billion-years-old, Earth is ~4.567 billion-years-old, and all humans have a common ancestor who lived ~200,000 years ago, and the ‘secular-scientists’ have accepted their own ‘universal quantum computer’ and chaos theory’s ‘underlying interconnectedness in apparently random events’ – there is now a bridge between Genasis and modern science (see Chicken or the egg? Genasis74 or evolution?).
“The fact that we are here to piece together what happened in the Big Bang, and explore the complexity of the cosmos, may not be coincidence.” - Big Bang
“It is not philosophy we are after, but the behavior of real things.” – Richard Feynman “This belief (Holy Shekinah/Venus Cycle) gave the writers of The Masonic Testament a structure for the universe, and it did lay down the foundations for modern science by suggesting that God decreed laws of nature which might be discovered by man.” – The Book of Hiram
“Michael Faraday and the Quaker-like Santamaneans believed that underneath the whole surface of reality, everything was created by God in a unified way. That if you opened up one little part of it, you could see how everything was connected.” – Einstein’s Big Idea
“Science wants to know the mechanism of the universe (how), religion the meaning (why). The two cannot be separated. Many scientists feel there is no place in research for discussion of anything that sounds mystical. But it is unreasonable to think we already know enough about the natural world to be confident about the totality of forces.” - Charles Townes 1964 Nobel Prize in Physics
“Edward Lorenz had mimicked both aperiodicity and sensitive dependence on initial conditions (+ the butterfly effect) in his toy version of the weather: 12 equations, calculated over and over again with ruthless mechanical efficiency. How could such richness, such unpredictability – such chaos – arise from a simple deterministic system?... Years later, physicists would give wistful looks when they talked about Lorenz’s paper… By then it was talked about as if it were an ancient scroll, preserving secrets of eternity.” – Chaos by James Gleick
“Humans tend to abhor chaos & avoid it…nature uses chaos…to create new entities, shape events, and hold the Universe together.” – 7 Life Lessons of Chaos
“Jazz music is an excellent example of chaos theory creation – a feedback-loop combining rules & order with improvisation & apparent randomness.” – BW
Uncertainty Principle: impossible to absolutely know both position & momentum of a subatomic particle. – Werner Heisenberg (**died at 74 [plan-i† †heory])
“It is this revolutionary scientific model (quantum mechanics) that finally penetrated the veil of religion by demonstrating that observation could affect the observed. These realms of thought must not merely coexist in the mind of the scientist and the theologian, but must be allowed to be integrated – simply because they are so obviously intertwined.” – Apollo 14 Astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell
“The anthropic principle expresses itself in two ways: (1) very slight changes in the laws of nature would have made it impossible for life to exist, and (2) human life would not have been possible if not for the occurrence in the past of a large number of highly improbable events. Whereas the secular scientist sees these occurrences as no more than lucky accidents, the believing person sees in them the hand of the Creator.” - Nathan Aviezer
“Science investigates, religion interprets. Science gives man knowledge which is power, religion gives man wisdom which is control”. - MLK
11/5/02 2:09 t 6/30/14 10:36
There Are No Coincidences - there is synchronism, design and alignment
'Grand Scheme' of God vs. Quantum Physics & Chaos Theory
“Ancient Egyptian ministers of religion were also the ministers of science…two of the noblest missions.”
– Jean Champollion
“Science is the attempt to make the chaotic diversity of our sense-experience correspond to a logically uniform system of thought.” (Quantum mechanics has experimentally proven that there can be effects without ‘local’ causes; that material things can pop in and out of existence thanks to bizarre phenomena called quantum fluctuations.) “The theory yields much, but it hardly brings us close to the secrets of the Old One… In any case, I am convinced that God does not play dice." – Einstein b 3.14*
For some time now, the scientific community has been split. Both groups strongly believe in the capabilities of science and humankind’s destiny to continue to discover the natural secrets of this universe. Both factions agree that we’ve uncovered and created great things with science in the past and that this will continue to intensify in the future. The ‘first group of thought’ agrees with Albert Einstein when he said, “Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind”, and “Subtle is the Lord, malicious he is not. God hides his secrets because of his essential loftiness, but not by means of ruse”. Another Einstein quote, “I want to know how God created the world. I am not interested in this or that phenomenon; I want to know God’s thoughts. The rest are details”. Many scientists now, and throughout history, strongly believe in God - The Creator has been scientifically proven! For them, science and religion share the same goal: the pursuit of truth.
The second group of thought believe that there is no ‘Creator’ – no ‘Grand Scheme’. Humankind has ‘created God’. They often view religion as being for the mentally inferior. ‘God’ just doesn’t seem logical to them (and others) - they might even refer to themselves as atheists. For these scientists, everything happens by ‘chance’ based on quantum physics and chaos theory: the study of phenomena which appear random, but in fact have an element of regularity which can be described mathematically. Everything that happens affects everything else – ‘The Butterfly Effect’. (The scientific term chaos refers to an underlying interconnectedness that exists in apparently random events. Simple equations have the ability to generate motion so complex, so sensitive to measurement, that it appears to be by chance. It has shown that simple systems, obeying precise laws, can nevertheless act in a seemingly ‘random’ manner - the unpredictable leading to the new. Feedback loops exist everywhere.) These scientists may believe: “We are gods of our own universe(s) – we are the creators." So which view is correct: (A) or (B)?
In Corey S. Powell’s book God in the Equation, he constantly refers to Einstein as “the prophet of a new sci-religious era”. Einstein called God, “The Old One” and ‘put God into his equations’ describing his theory of general relativity. The Creator was symbolized by Lambda - the cosmological constant - and was once called Einstein’s biggest blunder! Powell tells the story of how this controversial factor got into the equations, how it was accepted by the scientific community, then rejected (due to the Big Bang & expanding universe), then accepted again, (then rejected again by João Magueijo's Varying Speed of Light Theory then accepted again by ‘dark energy’.) He states how recent cosmologists’ reports of our universe accelerating in its expansion are all based on this same factor: God in the Equation. Einstein and his followers’ use of the ‘God factor’ in science has never been recognized for what it is - a new era - a giant step in the history of human spirituality! But Einstein sought other answers – other theories besides those credited him in his lifetime. He spent the last 40 years of his life laboring over a unified field theory (‘Grand Unification’) which would unite general relativity – his theory of spacetime and gravitation – with electromagnetism and the strong and weak forces of the atom. M-theory may be this unified theory, but that’s only physics. Where are the other equations with GOD in them – ‘simple general public equations’ that wed much more than just subatomic particles/matter, forces, and spacetime - equations that can join history and present-day, religions and science? Where are the equations that unify peoples; that create peace and ‘Heaven on Earth’?!
“Einstein’s search for a unified theory in physics ran parallel with his wish for global peace and a unified world government where people treated other people humanely and sensibly. He spent his life working towards both of these goals: the unity of science & humanity.” – 101 Things You Didn’t Know About Einstein
My booklet reflects 33 years of sci-religious research and many more years in my previous lives! My The Conglomerate of Nonparallel-Universes Theory, Plan-it Theory: GOD=7_4 algorithm** or FOD=6_4 (PlanEt Nestor), U21nified S19trings Theory – the ‘Theory of Everything’, S=19 (18.6 algorithm/'fractal') Theory, Speed & Power of Thought Theory, Theory of Rena†ivi†y/Conglomeratal Energy eternal/Conglomeratal Relationships eternal Theories, Reincarnation Theory & its 23 Principles/Theory of Luck are these ‘God in the equations’. These may be the “7 seals” and this booklet may be the “book/scroll” referred to in Rev. 5:1-10:10. Have prophesies been fulfilled? Yes. And yet, it’s ultimately up to you to decide.
“You believe in a God who plays dice, and I in complete law & order,” said Einstein.
By the way, the answer to the question above - which is correct: (A) ‘Grand Scheme’ of God -or- (B) Quantum Physics & Chaos Theory? It’s (C) both of the above! (‘A or B’ is often a trap!) “Perhaps God can play dice and create a universe of complete law & order, in the same breath,” says Ian Stewart in Does God Play Dice? “This is a strange universe in which nothing may be as it seems. Familiar geometrical shapes such as circles and ellipses give way to infinitely complex structures known as fractals, the fluttering of a *butterfly’s wings can change the weather, and the gravitational attraction of a creature in a distant galaxy can change the fate of a solar system."
In Paths from Science towards God, Arthur Peacocke states, “God could cause particular events to occur which would express God’s intentions. These latter would not otherwise have happened had God not so specifically intended. Any such interaction of God with the world-System would be initially with it as a whole. One would expect this initial interaction to be followed by a kind of ‘trickle-down’ effect as each level affected by the particular divine intention then has an influence on lower levels and so on down the hierarchies of complexity to the level at which God intends to effect a particular purpose. We have already seen how in ‘chaotic’ systems, especially dissipative ones, states can differ in pattern and organization (and so in information content) yet be very close in energy74. This provides a flexible route for the transmission of divinely influenced information from the world-System as a whole down to particular systems within that whole. These could well include those of individual human-brains-in-human-bodies-in-society and so this could be the means whereby God is experienced in acts of meditation and worship – as well as recognized as ‘special providence’ in events judged to be responses to such human acts.” Or you could simply say, “There Are No Coincidences."
*Biblios=314 (Greek isopsephy) "God is a Geometer” = "Αεί3 Ο1 Θεός4 Ο1 Μέγας5 Γεωμετρεί9" - Plato pi=3.14159
Note: Since first writing this, there has been great discussion of Intelligent Design vs. Darwinian Evolution (“random mutations”). And there’s a continuing debate of whether this universe is anthropic (designed specifically for humans). As long as the ‘religious’ accept that the universe is ~13.82 billion-years-old, Earth is ~4.567 billion-years-old, and all humans have a common ancestor who lived ~200,000 years ago, and the ‘secular-scientists’ have accepted their own ‘universal quantum computer’ and chaos theory’s ‘underlying interconnectedness in apparently random events’ – there is now a bridge between Genasis and modern science (see Chicken or the egg? Genasis74 or evolution?).
“The fact that we are here to piece together what happened in the Big Bang, and explore the complexity of the cosmos, may not be coincidence.” - Big Bang
“It is not philosophy we are after, but the behavior of real things.” – Richard Feynman “This belief (Holy Shekinah/Venus Cycle) gave the writers of The Masonic Testament a structure for the universe, and it did lay down the foundations for modern science by suggesting that God decreed laws of nature which might be discovered by man.” – The Book of Hiram
“Michael Faraday and the Quaker-like Santamaneans believed that underneath the whole surface of reality, everything was created by God in a unified way. That if you opened up one little part of it, you could see how everything was connected.” – Einstein’s Big Idea
“Science wants to know the mechanism of the universe (how), religion the meaning (why). The two cannot be separated. Many scientists feel there is no place in research for discussion of anything that sounds mystical. But it is unreasonable to think we already know enough about the natural world to be confident about the totality of forces.” - Charles Townes 1964 Nobel Prize in Physics
“Edward Lorenz had mimicked both aperiodicity and sensitive dependence on initial conditions (+ the butterfly effect) in his toy version of the weather: 12 equations, calculated over and over again with ruthless mechanical efficiency. How could such richness, such unpredictability – such chaos – arise from a simple deterministic system?... Years later, physicists would give wistful looks when they talked about Lorenz’s paper… By then it was talked about as if it were an ancient scroll, preserving secrets of eternity.” – Chaos by James Gleick
“Humans tend to abhor chaos & avoid it…nature uses chaos…to create new entities, shape events, and hold the Universe together.” – 7 Life Lessons of Chaos
“Jazz music is an excellent example of chaos theory creation – a feedback-loop combining rules & order with improvisation & apparent randomness.” – BW
Uncertainty Principle: impossible to absolutely know both position & momentum of a subatomic particle. – Werner Heisenberg (**died at 74 [plan-i† †heory])
“It is this revolutionary scientific model (quantum mechanics) that finally penetrated the veil of religion by demonstrating that observation could affect the observed. These realms of thought must not merely coexist in the mind of the scientist and the theologian, but must be allowed to be integrated – simply because they are so obviously intertwined.” – Apollo 14 Astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell
“The anthropic principle expresses itself in two ways: (1) very slight changes in the laws of nature would have made it impossible for life to exist, and (2) human life would not have been possible if not for the occurrence in the past of a large number of highly improbable events. Whereas the secular scientist sees these occurrences as no more than lucky accidents, the believing person sees in them the hand of the Creator.” - Nathan Aviezer
“Science investigates, religion interprets. Science gives man knowledge which is power, religion gives man wisdom which is control”. - MLK
11/5/02 2:09 t 6/30/14 10:36